Recent advances in chiral selectors immobilization and chiral mobile phase additives in liquid chromatographic enantio-separations: A review.

For decades now, the separation of chiral enantiomers of drugs has been gaining the interest and attention of researchers. In 1991, the first guidelines for development of chiral drugs were firstly released by the US-FDA. Since then, the development in chromatographic enantioseparation tools has been fast and variable, aiming at creating a suitable environment where the physically and chemically identical enantiomers can be separated. Among those tools, the immobilization of chiral selectors (CS) on different stationary phases and the chiral mobile phase additives (CMPA) which have been progressed and studied extensively. This review article highlights the major advances in immobilization of CS together with their different recognition mechanisms as well as CMPA as a cheaper and successful alternative for chiral stationary phases. Moreover, the role of molecular modeling tool as a pre-step in the choice of CS for evaluating possible interactions with different ligands has been pointed up. Illustrations of reported methods and updates for immobilized CS and CMPA have been included.

Surface Design of Enantiomeric HPLC Separation on Vancomycin and Teicoplanin-Based Stationary Phases, a Tool for Chiral Recognition of Model ß-Blockers.

A quality-by-design approach was adopted for enantioseparation of atenolol on Vancomycin and Teicoplanin-based chiral stationary phases using reversed phase (RP) mode and polar ionic mode (PIM), respectively to account for major forces involved in enantiorecognition of ß-blockers on macrocyclics. A fractional factorial screening design for the two modes; followed by a central composite optimization design and regression analysis were able to point out critical factors and chromatographic responses and robust surface of the design. Within the studied range of flow the optimal was 0.3 mL/min for Chirobiotic T and 1 mL/min for Chirobiotic V. In PIM, a composition of 100% methanol was mandatory to compromise between best separation and least retention with equal amounts of the acid and base modifiers for enantiomers of atenolol, as model drug in addition to metoprolol and pindolol as structurally related compounds for possible extrapolation of results on members of the same class. However, in RP mode, only triethylamine acetate was needed as buffer for atenolol enantiomers. Chiral recognition of atenolol in both elution modes, further confirmed via extrapolation of the models on the two other ß-blockers showed that ionic interactions rather than any other forces governed chiral recognition on the two macrocyclic stationary phases in both modes.